Women-Led Companies Have Better Culture - Why Are We Still Surprised?

Every company says they want better culture. They'll spend six figures on workplace consultants, roll out elaborate employee engagement surveys, launch wellness programs nobody has time to use, and plaster values statements across every conference room wall. Then they'll promote the same people they've always promoted and act genuinely confused when nothing changes.

Meanwhile, the research has been screaming the answer at us for years. It's not complicated. It's not some mysterious cultural alchemy that only certain companies can access. The companies with the best cultures, the highest engagement, and the lowest turnover have something very specific in common: they have more women in leadership.

Not "more women somewhere in the building." More women actually leading teams and making decisions that affect how people experience work every single day.

Gallup's data shows that employee "feel valued" scores jump from 61% to 72% when their manager is a woman. Eleven percentage points. That's not a marginal improvement. That's the difference between people tolerating their jobs and actually giving a damn about the work they're doing.

The wild part? Most companies are sitting on this data and doing absolutely nothing with it. According to McKinsey's Women in the Workplace 2024 report, women still make up only 29% of C-suite positions despite being nearly half the workforce. We have definitive proof that women leaders create better workplace cultures, and yet corporate America is still promoting the same leadership profile that's been failing people for decades.

The data on women in leadership isn't just good. It's undeniable. Organizations with women in leadership report stronger recognition, more equitable workload distribution, and coaching-oriented feedback that slashes turnover intent by eight percentage points. Eight points. In an economy where replacing a single employee costs anywhere from 50% to 200% of their annual salary, that's not just a nice-to-have cultural benefit. That's a bottom-line business advantage that most companies are actively ignoring.

So why are we still pretending this is a diversity problem when it's actually a performance problem?

Companies with at least 30% women leaders score 8% higher on employee-satisfaction indexes. Organizations with an above-average number of women leaders are 1.9 times more likely to be rated as having an inclusive culture than those with fewer women. Employees who work for a female manager are six percentage points more engaged, on average, than those who work for a male manager.

These aren't feel-good stats from a diversity training deck. This is McKinsey, Gallup, and DDI telling us that the way women lead fundamentally changes how people experience work. And yet, women still make up only 29% of C-suite positions, despite being nearly half the workforce. The math isn't mathing, and it's costing companies billions in turnover, disengagement, and lost productivity.

The question isn't whether women make better managers (the data already answered that). The question is why we're so committed to promoting people who make everyone around them feel worse.

Something shifted in the last few years, and I don't think corporate America has caught up yet. The generation entering the workforce right now grew up watching authentic, vulnerable, real humans on their phones. They watched creators talk about mental health, burnout, and setting boundaries. They learned that authority without humanity is actually just... bullying with a business card.

These are the same people now sitting in your Monday morning standups, watching their managers interrupt, take credit, and gaslight them into thinking 60-hour weeks are "just part of the grind." And they're not buying it. According to the Women in the Workplace 2024 report, microaggressions are pervasive and harmful, and they're driving talented people out the door. Women who experience frequent microaggressions are twice as likely to feel disengaged or consider leaving their jobs.

The thing is, women leaders tend to create cultures where those microaggressions happen less. Not because women are inherently nicer or softer (please, I'm begging you to retire that narrative), but because they've spent their entire careers navigating workplace dynamics that required them to actually pay attention to how people feel. They learned to read the room because their careers depended on it. They learned to give credit where it's due because they spent years watching men take credit for their ideas. They learned to coach instead of command because nobody ever handed them a playbook that said "just be confident and people will follow."

That experiential knowledge? It translates directly into better management. Gallup's research shows that female managers are better at engaging their employees than male counterparts precisely because they understand that people aren't resources to be managed. They're humans to be developed.

The companies that are actually winning right now understand something the laggards don't: culture isn't a perk. It's not pizza Fridays and unlimited PTO that nobody takes. Culture is what happens when your manager recognizes your work, distributes tasks fairly, gives you feedback that actually helps you grow, and doesn't make you feel like you're drowning every single day.

Research from DDI found that in organizations with greater than the average number of women leaders, only 22% of men say their culture isn't inclusive. In male-dominated companies, that number jumps to 39%. Let that sink in. Even the men are noticing that cultures with more women in leadership feel more inclusive. This isn't just better for women, it's better for everyone.

The best companies I work with are doing a few things consistently. First, they're tracking their internal promotion rates by gender and holding leaders accountable when women consistently get passed over. Second, they're redefining what "leadership potential" looks like beyond who speaks up the most in meetings (spoiler: the person dominating the conversation isn't always the smartest person in the room). Third, they're creating sponsorship programs that pair high-potential women with executives who can actually open doors, not just offer generic "lean in" advice.

What they're not doing? Treating women's leadership development as a nice-to-have HR initiative. They're treating it like the competitive advantage it actually is. When you have companies offering progressive parental leave retaining 23% more women at director level and above, you start to realize that the companies investing in keeping women in leadership aren't just being equitable. They're being smart.

Let's be honest about where this actually breaks down. According to the Women in the Workplace 2024 report, for every 100 men promoted to manager, only 89 White women and even fewer women of color receive promotions. That first step up to management? That's where we lose them.

And it's not because women aren't ambitious, they're just not getting the same opportunities, the same sponsorship, or the same benefit of the doubt when they make mistakes (because god forbid a woman isn't perfect at a job she's doing for the first time).

This is the part that makes me want to flip tables. We have all the data showing that women create better cultures, drive higher engagement, and retain talent more effectively; and yet we're systematically blocking them from getting into management positions where they could actually do that. The cognitive dissonance is staggering.

Companies keep saying they want better retention, higher engagement, and more inclusive cultures. Great. Promote more women. It's literally that simple. Stop waiting for them to be twice as qualified as the man who got promoted because he "showed potential." Stop penalizing them for taking parental leave. Stop questioning their commitment when they ask for flexibility. Start looking at the actual results they're delivering and the teams they're building.

If you're reading this and thinking, "Okay, but what do I actually DO with this information?" here's where we get tactical.

First, audit your promotion practices. Not just the outcomes, but the actual decision-making process. Who gets visibility on high-profile projects? Whose ideas get credited in meetings? Who gets pulled into strategic conversations? If the answer is "mostly men," you have a pipeline problem that's costing you retention and culture points every single quarter.

Second, redefine what "executive presence" means. If your leadership team still thinks executive presence looks like the loudest voice in the room, you're selecting for dominance instead of effectiveness. The data shows that teams led by women report stronger recognition and more equitable workload distribution. That's what actual leadership looks like. Not whoever can talk the most confidently about things they don't understand.

Third, invest in sponsorship, not just mentorship. Mentorship is great for advice. Sponsorship is what actually opens doors, secures promotions, and changes careers. If you're not actively sponsoring women into visible, revenue-generating roles, you're perpetuating the exact dynamic that keeps leadership male-dominated.

Fourth, stop treating flexibility as a women's issue. McKinsey found that flexibility is now the norm, and employees consistently point to greater productivity and reduced burnout as primary benefits. Women aren't asking for special treatment when they request flexible arrangements. They're asking to do their jobs effectively without sacrificing their entire lives. 

Finally, measure what matters. Track engagement scores by manager gender. Track promotion rates. Track who's leaving and why. If you're seeing patterns where women consistently report lower satisfaction or leave more frequently, that's not a women problem. That's a leadership problem. Fix it.

We already know how to build better workplace cultures. We have the research. We have the data. We have living, breathing examples of companies that prioritized women in leadership and watched their engagement scores, retention rates, and yes, their bottom lines improve.

The issue isn't that we don't know what to do. The issue is that changing power structures makes people uncomfortable, and most companies would rather keep the status quo than deal with that discomfort. Even when the status quo is actively costing them money, talent, and competitive advantage.

Look at the numbers. Companies lose talent, hemorrhage engagement scores, and watch their best people walk out the door. Then they act surprised when the exit interviews all say the same thing: people don't leave companies, they leave managers. When 72% of employees feel valued under female leaders compared to just 61% under male leaders, and when that translates directly to retention and performance, ignoring this data isn't just bad for culture. It's bad for business.

The companies that win over the next decade won't be the ones with the flashiest perks or the most aspirational mission statements. They'll be the ones that actually looked at the data, made the uncomfortable changes, and built cultures where people feel valued, heard, and supported. Because that's what drives retention. That's what drives performance. And that's what women in leadership do better than anyone else.

So what are you waiting for? The data is in. The case is closed. The only question left is whether you're ready to actually do something about it.

Have ideas for future newsletters?
Hit reply and let me know what you'd like to see!

XX

P.S. Did you love this edit? Take 5 seconds to forward this to a friend who could use some no-bull advice and insights to get them through those “life is life-ing” days.