We've been asking the wrong question for five years straight.

Every headline, every LinkedIn thinkpiece, every exhausting all-hands meeting has centered on the same tired debate: remote or in-office? Work from home or return to the cubicle? It's like watching two people argue about whether to take the highway or the back roads while completely ignoring the fact that maybe we don't need to make the trip at all.

Meanwhile, the actual revolution has been happening quietly. Not in boardrooms or policy memos, but in the way we've collectively started actually living. Working in bursts between school pickups. Knocking out deep work at 6 AM before anyone's inbox explodes. Taking that 2 PM doctor's appointment without the performative guilt.

This isn't slacking. This isn't the death of productivity. This is microshifting, and according to Owl Labs' 2025 State of Hybrid Work Report, 65% of workers want it. That number jumps to 73% for millennials.

The conversation has moved on without us. Time to catch up.

Let's get something straight: the eight-hour workday wasn't designed for knowledge workers. It was designed for factory floors during the Industrial Revolution, when productivity meant widgets produced and hours clocked.

The assembly line didn't care about your circadian rhythm or your kid's recital or the fact that your brain literally cannot focus for eight consecutive hours (neuroscience said that, not me). The system cared about butts in seats and hands on machines.

We don't live in that world anymore. Most of us aren't producing physical widgets. We're producing ideas, strategies, code, content, and connections. None of that gets better when you force it into an arbitrary time container. Your best strategic thinking doesn't happen between 2 and 4 PM just because that's when the meeting got scheduled.

Microshifting is basically the acknowledgment that we're grown adults who understand how we work best. It means working in short, flexible blocks matched to your energy, your responsibilities, your actual life. Not punching a clock. Not performing productivity for someone watching. Actually doing the work when you can do it well.

We spent three years proving that physical presence has almost nothing to do with output. Companies kept running. Projects shipped. Revenue happened. Somehow, miraculously, the world didn't collapse because Karen from accounting worked in sweatpants.

Now here's where it gets interesting and a little infuriating. Despite all of that, companies are doubling down on return-to-office mandates like we collectively hallucinated 2020 through 2023.

Amazon, Dell, Meta, JPMorgan, even The Washington Post have demanded employees come back full-time. According to Fortune, a quarter of executives ADMITTED their RTO mandates were designed to make employees quit. Like, they said that out loud. On the record.

This is the energy we're working with.

The result? A workplace phenomenon called "hybrid creep" where required office days keep inching up, and a burned-out workforce practicing "quiet cracking", silently falling apart while still showing up. Ninety percent of workers say their stress is the same or worse than last year. The 9-to-5 cage might have new bars, but it's still a cage.

The uncomfortable truth sitting at the center of all this is that microshifting only works if leadership trusts its people; and a lot of leadership fundamentally does not do it.

The irony? The same managers clutching their pearls about remote work are the ones whose teams are MORE productive. According to the same Owl Labs report, 69% of managers said hybrid or remote work has made their teams more productive. Sixty-nine percent. The data is there. The outcomes are there. The trust is not.

Many leaders still equate visibility with productivity, even though anyone who's ever worked in an office knows that presence means exactly nothing. I've seen people spend eight hours "at work" accomplishing less than someone who logged three focused hours from their kitchen table. Attendance is not output. Showing up is not showing results.

The companies that figure this out will win. Full stop. The ones clinging to butts-in-seats management are writing resignation letters for their best people, to be delivered the moment the job market loosens up.

I'm not theorizing here. My team is spread across the globe. Literally different continents, different time zones, different morning routines. We've never shared an office, and honestly? We never will. That's not a limitation. That's the whole point.

Here's what works for us: one weekly team meeting where everyone shows up, cameras on, ready to actually connect. Not a status update that could have been a Slack message. Real conversation. Real check-ins. What's working, what's not, what do you need from me. The rest of the week? We trust each other to get it done. Because we hired adults who know how to do their jobs.

Someone on my team might knock out their best work at 11 PM their time because that's when their brain fires. Another person might do deep work at 5 AM. I don't need to see them sitting at a desk to know the work is happening. I see the work. That's the only metric that actually matters.

Could we be more "efficient" if we were all in the same room? Maybe for certain things. Brainstorming hits different in person, I won't pretend otherwise. But would we have the TALENT we have if we required everyone to live within commuting distance of a single office? Absolutely not. The trade-off isn't even close.

Microshifting isn't some productivity hack for tech bros optimizing their morning routines. It's survival infrastructure for people with actual lives outside work.

Sixty-eight percent of working parents are worried that their caregiving responsibilities might affect their job performance. That number climbs to 71% for people forced into full-time office attendance. Because of course it does. When you're strapped to a desk from 9 to 5, the school pickup becomes a crisis. The pediatrician appointment becomes a negotiation. Your child's existence becomes a scheduling problem you have to solve around someone else's arbitrary timeline.

Microshifting says: what if the work still gets done, but you also get to be a human being? What if we measured output instead of hours? What if we trusted adults to manage their own time like the adults they are?

The data shows employees would sacrifice 9% of their annual salary for flexible working hours. NINE PERCENT. People are literally willing to take a pay cut for the ability to live their lives. That's not laziness. That's desperation for something that should have been baseline all along.

The future of work isn't about location. It never was. It's about control. It's about who gets to decide when your brain engages with your job and when it gets to rest, create, connect, or just exist without a Slack notification interrupting.

Microshifting is one answer. Maybe not THE answer for every role or every industry. Obviously, a surgeon can't microshift a surgery, and your barista can't make your coffee from home. Knowledge work isn't all work. But for those of us whose jobs live in our laptops and our heads? The question isn't where we work. It's whether we get to work like humans or like machines.

I know which one I'm choosing, and based on the numbers, so do most of you.

What does flexibility actually look like in your work right now? Are you microshifting without calling it that? Or are you stuck in a system that treats your time like it belongs to someone else? I want to hear it.

Have ideas for future newsletters?
Hit reply and let me know what you'd like to see!

XX

P.S. Did you love this edit? Take 5 seconds to forward this to a friend who could use some no-bull advice and insights to get them through those “life is life-ing” days.