Content Got Smart in the Dumbest Way Possible

Last year, content got smart in the dumbest way possible. I don't mean that as an insult; I mean it as the highest compliment I can give to a generation that refuses to accept information gatekeeping as the norm.

Somewhere between pandemic lockdowns and the TikTok algorithm taking over our lives, education got a glow-up. Complex topics that used to require expensive degrees or dense textbooks are now being explained in 90-second videos with production quality that makes cable news look ancient. 

Constitutional law, macroeconomic policy, quantum physics; all being broken down by creators who understand that accessibility doesn't mean dumbing things down.

We're living through what I'm calling the TikTok-ification of education, where complex ideas get remixed, democratized, and delivered in ways that actually respect people's intelligence. 

Knowledge isn't locked behind paywalls or prerequisites anymore, it's circulating freely, being explained by people who genuinely understand it and can make it make sense.

For years, traditional institutions insisted that real learning required expensive degrees, thick textbooks, and academic jargon designed to exclude rather than include. The internet said "cool story, but no thanks" and democratized everything. Coding tutorials, financial literacy, political theory; all suddenly accessible to anyone with a phone and curiosity.

What's fascinating is how audiences evolved alongside the content. They got smarter, sharper, and infinitely more demanding. People aren't just watching anymore, they're analyzing, fact-checking, and calling out lazy takes with the precision of a New Yorker editorial from the 90s.

Go read the comments under any trending post about business, culture, or politics; you'll find mini essays, nuanced takes, and corrections that would make professional editors jealous. The comments section is lit up with the kind of cutting observations once reserved for brutal think pieces. Audiences aren't passive consumers anymore, they're collaborators, critics, and curators all at once.

They've been trained by years of content consumption to spot performative nonsense from a mile away. Substance in content has become non-negotiable. Not substance as in academic density, but substance as in actual value, original perspective, and genuine expertise. Your audience wants to learn something they didn't know or see something from an angle they hadn't considered. Anything less is just noise.

The power dynamic has fundamentally shifted. Traditional gatekeepers no longer control the narrative. Influence has gone grassroots. A college student with a ring light and a clear explanation can reach more people than a major publication running a multi-million dollar campaign.

The old playbook of "create content, push it out, hope people consume it" is dead. The new playbook is participatory and conversational. The most successful creators aren't broadcasting messages, they're starting dialogues. A single post can spawn hundreds of response videos and critique threads that extend the conversation far beyond the original creator's intent.

That's how culture gets built now; it's crowdsourced, and it lives in our ability to remix and reinvent in a million different ways. Nobody fully controls the narrative because the narrative is constantly being rewritten by millions of people simultaneously.

Now, how do you find your brand and perspective when the balance of influence lies in the details? You stop trying to be everything to everyone and start getting specific about what only you can say.

Your perspective isn't built on trends or what's getting engagement this week, it's built on your specific expertise, your lived experience, and the patterns you've noticed that others haven't connected yet. The question isn't "what should I post?" The question is "what do I know that my audience needs to hear, explained in a way only I can explain it?"

Look at what they're already asking in the comments, look at where the conversations are happening without you, that's where your content needs to go. Your job is to show up consistently with a clear point of view, engage authentically, and add something new to the dialogue. 

Not recycled advice with new branding, not surface-level takes for engagement; real insights from real experience, delivered in a way that respects your audience's intelligence.

The creators who win understand this: your audience is smarter than your content strategy. They want authenticity, expertise, and entertainment wrapped into something that respects their time. Gatekeeping information is boomer-coded. Oversimplifying to meaninglessness is equally outdated. The sweet spot is accessible without being condescending, entertaining without sacrificing substance.

We're not going back to the old model where institutions controlled information and audiences passively consumed whatever was served. The creators who thrive will treat their community like collaborators, respect their intelligence, and consistently deliver value that justifies the attention they're asking for.

Have ideas for future newsletters?
Hit reply and let me know what you'd like to see!

XX

P.S. Did you love this edit? Take 5 seconds to forward this to a friend who could use some no-bull advice and insights to get them through those “life is life-ing” days.